Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - SAP for Public Sector
Viewing all 1444 articles
Browse latest View live

Unable to perform FMJ2 - No open items to be carried forward found

$
0
0

Dear Experts.

 

We are performing year end activities in FM and while executing transaction FMJ2 we are facing a problem. We want to carry forward our open PO's and PR's to FY 2013. However when I am executing FMJ2 the system is unable to find any open items although there are sufficient PO's and PR's in the system.

It would be of great help if you are able to instruct me on this topic.

Looking forward for your valuable inputs,

 

Thanks and regards,

AyanM.


BPCARRC0 - Check Assignment Object

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We got error No assignment object determined for  .... Messge No: BP747, While posting accountin document . we have checked BPCARRC0 - Check Assignment Object  and found that Payment Budget commitement items and Fund Centers are not assigned budget structrue .

 

Please suggest how to correct the system ..,

 

Regards,

 

Sujana

Budget check during PO deletion.

$
0
0

Hi,

My client FY from April -March. PR created on Nov.2012 with consumption of budget 2111.00, from PR, PO created on Feb 2013 with value 2407.00. It was open item till 31 March 2013 year end closing it was forwarded through FMJ2 to next FY 2013(1st April 2013).Due to some reason user want to delete that item from PO but system showing error message of non availability of budget during FY 2012, where the budget is available in FY2013 is 2Lakh but in FY 2012 available budget is ZERO.

 

My concern is why system checking the budget of FY 2012 where all commitment forwarded to FY 2013.

what is the standard procedure ??

 

Regards,

Rabin

Fund Center Design issue

$
0
0

Hi,

 

my clients wants 2 budgets

 

Commitment Budget and

Payment budget

 

for commitment only PR and PO should be updated and for Payment Budget GR or Fi expense and payment should be updated.

 

I am not sure is it possible.?

 

Further, They want different release and Availibility strategy. For Commitment, it should be Anually budgeting, release and Availbility. For payment Budget, they need Anuual budget but quarterly release and availibility check

 

regards,

Atul

Fund Center Design

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am new to Fund center Budgeting.

 

We need 2 Budgets

 

- Commitments budgets  ( This will update only PR, PO)

- Payment Budget (This will get update on GRN, Payment or FI transaction)

 

Further, Commitment Budget can be multi year and release will be for same and also avialbility also for same period

 

However, Payment Budget will be yearly but release and avialbility will be on Quaterly basis.

 

We are in EHP6. Questions:

 

- Is it possible to have 2 budgets for same FM area with separate release and Availbility control.

 

- Can i have 2 different Budgeting strategies

 

- How can i have Update profile that will update Commitment and payment budget separately.

 

Your quick response will be highly appreciated.

 

regards,
Adi

Reassignment not inherited in PO

$
0
0

Hi:

We have fixed wrong commitment items hit at PR usinging FMCB and FMCT. Now i am facing a issue. A PR whose commitment item was A and we changed it B vis reassignment. When we create PO with reference to Reassigned PR, system not inheriting PR commitment item, instead it is calling from FMDERIVE.. Is there a way to aboid it , fixing derivation rules is last option ..

 

Regards

Adding an additional field to FM document structure

$
0
0

Hi All

 

I am trying to add Purchase Organization (EKORG) field to the FM document structure and I need help.

 

The commitment item is derived based on GL + Purchase Org field at the time of PO. To serve this purpose, I have included Purchase Org field in my FMDerive using "EXIT_SAPLFMDT_002"

 

Would adding the purchase org field to the structureFMAVC_S_AFMA_ADDRESS_SUPPL in the ABAP Dictionary should do the job? With the technical team's help, I added the field to the above structure but it still does not show up in my FM document layout selection.

 

Please suggest if there is any other BAdi to include a field in FM document structure.

 

Thank a lot.

 

PV

FMCT not working

$
0
0

Hi:

 

We are facing an issue in FMCT reassignment, there are PR which were reassigned through FMCB and and FMCT Process. We reassigned Fund center in them .In first fund center it can  be seen that for supplies only 1500 is being shown in consumable . However when we double click it system shows many PRs with values but their total not appearing in on upfront screen.

Moreover in in the old fund center still some amounts can be seen in consumed column as can be seen image, although they were reassigned through FMCB and FMCT . If i double click them i do not see any amount line item. Please guide me what can be the issue. I also ran FMN3N after FMCT but it did not yielded any result. 109.jpg

 

Regards


No Update FMIOI and KBLP tables with purchase order

$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have un serious problem : No Update FMIOI and KBLP tables with purchase order

 

System :  SAP ERP 6.0 /7.0 - EHP 4

Note 965633 was read.

 

1) First case: The purchase order 4510000673 does not reduce the funds reservation.

 

Purchase order 4510000673 should consume the funds reservation 1200000193 because all post of the PO charge the funds reservation 1200000193.But the consumption history of the funds reservation 1200000193 donu2019t show this consumption.

In table FMIOI, we do not have lines with amount type 0200 (reduction) but whe have the lines with the post of PO with amount type (0100).  The Purchase order 4510000673 should consume the funds reservation 1200000193.

In table KBLP, the fields are :

 

Total amount (LC) - HWGES  = 53.409,40

Amount used u2013 WTABB = 0,00

Reduction amount u2013 HWABB = 0,00

Open amount u2013 CWTFREE =    53.409,40

Reduced amount u2013 WTABG = 0,00

Reduced amount u2013HWABG = 0,00

 

To solve the problem, we executed the transactions : FM4N et FMN5 and the program RFFMRC20 but no result.

 

2) Second case : Delete a item of a purchase order does not release the budget

 

The single item of the purchase order 4510000597 is deleted but in the display of consumption History of the funds reservation 1200000137, the amount of the purchase order is not to zero.

 

To solve the problem, we executed the transactions : FM4N et FMN5 and the program RFFMRC20 but no result.

 

 

Somebody already had a similar problem ?

 

Thank you

 

Fabian

No budget check during MB1A mov type 201

$
0
0

Dear All

 

How to exclude MB1A by using mov type 201 from budget check. I actually want to issue goods to cost center and don't want budget consumption in cost center where goods and issue and on the same time sending plants budget should also not be reduced

 

Thanks in advance

Value type 50 Data not shown in Report

$
0
0

Hi:

 

I am developing a report for my client in which i have added a column for PR value type 50 as shown in image attached but system is not showing value in it. If i put * in it system start showing values in it but it includes all values of value types, Am i missing anything ?

107.jpg

Uploading budget in different currency from FM Area Currency

$
0
0

Hi team,

 

we have 2 FM areas with FM AREA 1 - AED and FM AREA - 2 INR. The budget will be uploaded with USD Currency at starting of the year. my requirement here is when user is performing transaction, how system will do AVC check in AED Currency or INR Currency. Do we required to maintain any configuration set up.

 

Please help on this.

 

Regards

Sam

Error "FI 606 no commitment items selected" during Goods Receipt

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We use Fund Management and Material Ledger in ECC 6.0.

 

Posting goods receipt for material with price control S (Standard price) were successful, but whenever we post goods receipt for material with price control V (Moving average price), the following error comes up:

 

No commitment items selected

Message no. FI606

System Response

No commitment items selected

 

 

What might be the problem?

 

The account assignment in MIGO view are already filled with fund center and commitment item number automatically

 

We already assigned all that can be assigned in FMDERIVE (material to comm item, plant to comm item, gl to comm item, etc)

 

We also already check OSS notes: 939545, 148967, 1312483, 164077

 

 

Please help

 

Thanks

FM activation issue in ECC 6.0 / SWF5

$
0
0

Dear All Experts,

 

I am configuring Funds Management, so as a initial steps I have activate Public Sector Management menu in SPRO. As per guidance available on SDN I have activate EA - PS from SWF5.

 

I am selecting EA-PS and then clicking on Activate Changes button. I am getting below message as " No Activation Necessary Message no. SFW075".

 

If its activated :


1 ) How would I come to know ?


2 ) Where I will get the path for FM Activation ?


2 ) If not then any other procedure need to follow to activate it?


Experts guidanece will be appreciated on this.


Thanks a lot.


Regards,

 

Sharvari Joshi.

Quantity based check in procurement process

$
0
0

Hi,

 

we are creating Funds Reservation (Value and Quantity) against each material group and the using it in creation of PR, PO at GR.

 

Value is checking in PR created against Funds Reservation.

 

Here my requirement is, When Creating PR/PO (Qty) is there any standard system check for not exceeding quantity maintained in Funds Reservation.

 

 

 

Regards

Sam


Grants Management Configuration

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I am new to Public Sector. We are doing implementation for a social service organisation.

 

Can anybody help me understand the do and dont of Grants management w.r.t configuration.

 

Thanks,

 

Srikanth

FM - Derive Commitment Item from MATKL in Purchase Requisition

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

My problem is as follows: We try to derive Commitment Item from Material Group, for Purchase Requisitions and Purchase Orders. We have added MATKL in CI_FMDERIVE and inside an append structure we have created for COBL. We have activated EXIT_SAPLFMDT_002 in order to populate FMDERIVE from COBL. We have a derivation strategy with a single step of type enhancement, source field is MATKL and target is COMMIT_ITEM.

 

Everything works fine if we enter a material without an account assignment category in the PR/PO. The previously added field COBL-MATKL is populated so we can assign it to FMDERIVE-MATKL in and then use it in the derivation (we have written some code in EXIT_SAPLFMDT_001).

 

However, If we use account assignment category K in our PR/PO, MATKL is not populated in COBL even if we do have a material (not short text).*

 

Is this behavior standard and expected, meaning that when an account assignment category is entered, some fields of the PR/PO, like MATNR, are excluded from COBL? Or perhaps we are missing something?

 

Have thoroughly searched SCN for related posts, have found several ones that are quite relevant but still I cannot figure out the issue.

 

Thanks in advance!

 

 

 

* even in this case we could write some ABAP in EXIT_SAPLFMDT_002 to find MATKL from Material master in table MARA (Material number is available in COBL in every case). But still, we have a case where no material in entered, only short text and material group is entered by the user.

FI Clearing Document

$
0
0

I am trying to find a way to get the clearing document for an invoice.  I can get the PR, PO, GR, and IR for a given purchase, I am just having an issue linking any data from the previous to the clearing document.  Ultimately I am interested in finding out when the Invoice was paid via the tables.  Can anyone shed some light or point me in the right direction?  I have tried querying BSEG, but this times out.  I have also tried to find linking information in BSAK, but I have been unable.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

Reassignment in Grants Management

$
0
0

Hi:

 

We are facing some issues in Grants management. In SAP GM-GTE we have some Good receipts which were to be updated in Grants management but due to wrong derivation rules they hit FM account assignment. Now I want to fix them without having to reverse them in SAP. I want to ask if we have any reassignment facility in SAP GM-GTE. to fix these kind of instances. Please guide me.

 

Regards

error FMUP044

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

We´ve already aplied several SAP notes but unfortunatly the system has showed the error code FMUP044.

 

My scenary (step-by-step):

 

 

1) I create one Down payment request (F-47):

 

     PK (39) vendor       100,00-

 

 

2) I paid the document account of Down payment request created above (F-53):

 

     PK (50) bank account 100,00-

     PK (29) vendor       100,00 (clearing the CR vendor of item 1 above)

 

 

3) We need to clear vendor down payment (BD vendor of item 2 above) with F-54 transaction for release

  budget balance in this case 100,00 and then will be possible to create purchase order after

 

  In F-54 I filled only the vendor code and i selected the document account of Down payment request paid (item 2 above)

 

In the sumulation (F-54) the system show me:

 

*     PK (39B) vendor       100,00- (clearing of DB in item 2)*

*     PK (26)  vendor       100,00  (to be clearing with invoice before)*

 

In this point the system has showed the error code FMUP044. I think that some configuration isn´t correct

 

or is lack in new/gl because in this case I only have itens with vendor code in this account document.

 

 

Thank you a lot

 

Best regards

Claudio

 

Viewing all 1444 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>