Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - SAP for Public Sector
Viewing all 1444 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Budget return during PR/PO close

November 26, 2014, 4:48 am
$
0
0

HI sapient

 

 

CASE (SERVICE PROCUREMENT PROCESS)

 

PR created - 20 quantity value @ 10 = 200 (Budget consumed in PR Rs 200)

 

PO created - 10 quantity value @10 = 100 (Differential budget return {200-100=100))

 

Service entry sheet has been created for 8 quantity and invoice booked for 8 quantity @ 10 = Rs 80

 

User closed the PO (delivery completion) with remaining quantity of 2

 

PR is also closed subsequently

 

ISSUE

 

After closing the PR and PO with remaining quantity 2 system didnt return back the budget of balance quantity of 2 @ 10 = 20

 

Please look in to the issue

 

Thanks & regards

 

Sasanka

↧
Search

Maintain the funds center in IT0001/0027

March 9, 2010, 4:41 am
$
0
0

Hi all.

 

Could any one helps me with the following:

 

If the integration of CO-FM is activated  in V_FM01_CO_INTEGR and the date for activating of the integration CO-FM for HR is in the past for example 01/01/2007 the fields funds center and commitment item are hiden in the HR screens (IT 0001, 0027) for all records since 01/01/2007. But you can manually maintain these fields for all records wich endda is 12/31/2006.

 

I want to maintain the funds center in IT0001 always, so I donu2019t fill the date which means that I donu2019t want to activate  the integration CO-FM for HR and want to maintain manually the fields mentioned above. 

 

In the table V_T001_FM3 I set the date 01/01/1990 for the field "Funds center in HR". 

 

After that the field Funds center is appeared in IT0001 for maintaining but when you set the value the message comes

"Account assignment Funds Center is inactive in HR on 18.12.2009 and must therefore be empty"

 

 

I think here is an error.

 

Best regards,

Alice.

 

Edited by: Alice Oganesyan on Mar 10, 2010 10:38 AM

 

Edited by: Alice Oganesyan on Mar 10, 2010 10:48 AM

 

Edited by: Alice Oganesyan on Mar 10, 2010 10:48 AM

↧
↧

Cost Center 1:1 Relationship with fund center

June 15, 2012, 9:56 am
$
0
0

Hi:

I have defined derivation based on material and valuation class and have derived fund center and commitment items based on it. I read on most of the occasion that there is 1 to1 relationship of fund center to cost center but here in this stock budgeting routed through MM, we do not need any cost center , stock GL account is balance sheet item and is a current asset, so in this case we will not need any cost center linked to fund center ..Right? I just want to confirm the assumption i have made.

Thanks

Regards

↧

Contract account replication from CRM to PSCD for SAP Social services

November 22, 2013, 4:22 am
$
0
0


Hi Experts,


I am involved in a SAP social service service implementation where both CRM and PSCD(ECC) is being used. It has been decided that the business partners would be created in SAP CRM and then replicated to ECC. However the contract account would be created in PSCD(ECC). Can someone suggest how the contract accounts should be created in PSCD(ECC)? I am thinking it should be done programmatically using BAPI. Is there any other way or it is better to replicate them from CRM itself.

Also is creating Contract objects necessary for posting documents in PSCD where SAP social services is involved.

 

 

Thanks in advance,
Anwesha.

↧

FM Activation while Running with Other SAP Modules

November 30, 2014, 8:26 am
$
0
0


Hi

 

We are implementating FM BCS Mdule in Year 2014 with profile 101, GR and IR update.

Now the current settings which we did are running correctly for 2014 year postings

But

Open Purchase Order - Purchase Created in 2013 but GR is coming in 2014

Error : System is consuming the budget in 2014 when we do GR in 2014.

Solution which we explored : We have Run FMN4N PO Recontruction Program. but system is not seleccting the Purchase orders in this Transaction.

Alternative solution which we explored : Reassignment of Account Assignment Eements.

we will create the new derivation rule to derive the Dummy commitment items for old PO's

and through FMCN and FMCT we will assign in PO's.

 

can anybody help on the otther approaches to be followed on this.

 

Thanks in Advance

SAM.

↧
↧

FM - Statistical Budget S1 Missing in FMBBC

November 18, 2014, 3:15 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have a requirement where we need to post Statistical Budget for the same Commitment items and Funds Centers for reporting purpose.

 

I have configured Statistical Budget Type, Document Type and status but still we are not getting BCS Value Type "S1" in Budgeting workbench.

 

However, we have successfully posted Statistical Budget using BAPI program (Z program developed for budget upload using BAPI BAPI_0050_CREATE)

 

11-18-2014 1-39-57 PM.gif

Am I missing anything which is not allowing me to display S1 in T.Code FMBBC.


Thanks,

Ankish

↧

HR Master Data Requirements for PEP/PBF

December 3, 2014, 9:39 pm
$
0
0

Hi PBF Team/Experts,

 

We are beginning our field/table mapping to load master data from ECC to BW/PBF. Primarily wondering if we will have to create and configure data in a way to enable PBF and PEP functionality, if there is a workaround, or if some of the fields are not required. Maybe I missed it in documentation, but please help out:

 

1) is all the following HR master data 100% required for PEP/PBF

2) at what level does data need to reside (employee, job, or position or any combination)

3) does the HCM need to be configured a particular way? For example, Jobs are not classes but 1-1 mapping to Positions. This was a union requirement.

4) loading or configuring components in specific order (see below)?

 

Example at our client:

  • We are not storing pay scale or grade at the job or position level (planned compensation infotype 1005), but rather only directly in IT0008 at employee level through T510. Do we need to for PBF budgeting and or PEP?

InfoObject Name

Description

/PBFBI/FM_AREA

FM Area

/PBFBI/EMPLOYE

Employee

/PBFBI/POSTN

Position

/PBFBI/JOB

Job

/PBFBI/FUND_CT

Fund Center

/PBFBI/FUNDPGM

Funded Program

/PBFBI/FUNCARA

Functional Area

/PBFBI/GRANT

Grant

/PBFBI/FUND

Fund

/PBFBI/CMMT_IT

Commitment Item

/PBFBI/BEN_ARE

Benefit Area

/PBFBI/BEN_PLN

Benefit Plan

/PBFBI/PYSCLVL

Pay Scale Level

/PBFBI/PPERIOD

Performance Period

InfoObject Name

Description

/PBFBI/FM_AREA

FM Area

/PBFBI/EMPLOYE

Employee

/PBFBI/POSTN

Position

/PBFBI/JOB

Job

/PBFBI/BEN_ARE

Benefit Area

/PBFBI/BEN_PLN

Benefit Plan

/PBFBI/PYSCLVL

Pay Scale Level

 

 

Last, I'm confused on the documentation wording:

Personnel Expenditure Planning - SAP Public Budget Formulation - SAP Library

Most of the data needed for the fiscal period and pay period PEP calculation will be imported from the HR system. The information will be imported at the beginning of each budget formulation process. Within SAP Public Budget Formulation, the fiscal period and flexible pay period PEP calculations are based on data defined for positions, employees, jobs, benefit rules and rates, and pay levels. Each of these elements are defined separately but are related. Due to the relationships between each of the PEP elements, the components must be defined in a specific order:

  1. Pay Levels
  2. Benefit Rules
  3. Benefit Rates
  4. Jobs
  5. Positions
  6. Employees


"the components must be defined in a specific order" - does that mean configured in that order or imported from HR system in that order?


Thanks a bunch!


-Nick

↧

Fund Center is not deriving for alpha-numeric Cost Center

December 4, 2014, 2:27 am
$
0
0

Hi all

 

In our cost center hierarchy i have numeric and alpha-numeric cost centers. Funds Management BCS is active in our company. I have created a assignment rule in FMDERIVE to derive fund center from cost center. this rule is working fine with  the cost centers which are beginning with numeric values like 100003, 200001 etc. But system is not deriving the Fund Center from Cost Centers which are beginning with alphabets like AB00001, DC00004 etc. During the transaction posting i am having the error Message no. FI313 "

No funds center entered/derived in item 00001 ".

 

Regards,

 

Kashif

↧
Search

Erorr When Creating Reservation in MB21

December 2, 2014, 8:18 pm
$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

When trying to create Reservation via MB21 i got erorr message like this..

 

Entry in field Cost Center not allowed; check the field control

 

Message no. FMEF009

 

We have integration between MM and FM, and currently we are using EHP 606 and business function PSM_FM_C1 has been activated, i already maintained OBC4 and OME9, but still i got this erorr

 

please help

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Angga Saputra

↧
↧

Chain Carryforward PO

December 2, 2014, 5:36 am
$
0
0

Good morning,

 

I have a Fund reservation of 1.000 and related to it a Purchase order of 100.

 

Through FMJ2 I select the carryforward of the PO (value type 51) and its budget associated.

 

Expected result: I would like the carryforward to take just the 100 related to the PO, 100 from the Fund reservation and of course the 100 for budget.

 

     Budget:                +100

     Commitments:      FR +100 & -100 and PO +100

 

Result: the problem is that also takes the rest of the fund reservation (900) as commitment and also as budget.

 

     Budget:                +100 + 900

     Commitments:      FR +100 -100 +900 and PO +100

 

Any idea about how to control this?

 

regards,

Daniel

↧

fmbs149: delete posting address

December 4, 2014, 4:13 am
$
0
0


Hello,

 

I have posting in the following year and I do not have activated the AVC for future years. So some users made postings (earmarked funds) without budget, as it was no needed.

 

Now, I have changed the fund center structure and the users have adapted these earmarked funds to the new structure. The value for the old posting address is 0, but the are entries remain in the FMIT table.

 

I would like to delete the posting addres from FMBSPO but I get of course error fmbs149.

 

Any idea to delete the entries? I do not want the user to use them any more.

 

Regards,

Daniel

↧

Unable to post FR50 (Original Budget) for New Fund Center

February 1, 2012, 6:47 am
$
0
0

Dear All,

 

We are in ECC6.0 and using Former Budgeting, Our business team created a new fund center and assigned it to cost center in the derivation rule.

 

Before they granted original budget using FR50, the business users started posting various invoices, expenses, POs, PRs against the cost center accordingly the Available Budget became Negative.

 

Now they are trying to post Original Budget for the new fundcenter using FR50, however system gives an error saying Payment Budget exceeded.

 

Please advice how to grant budget in such situations, we had an alternative to reverse all commitments and actuals posted against the fundcenter and grant budget, this worked in our test environment. However in Production we will not be able to do this due to too much volume already posted.

 

Is there a way to fix this, note that Availability control is active and not sure why system allowed to post without budget.

 

Any pointers, is this how standard SAP behaves or are we missing something.

 

We have also checked on master data elements of commitment item/fundcenter.. everythign looks fine.

 

request your inputs.

 

regards

Diwakar

↧

Budget Entry Documents Authorization for Process

December 2, 2014, 3:37 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

We have a requirement to allow only Transfer process to certain user when posting transfer budgeting documents in FMBB.

 

Can you please help here what configurations needs to be done to allow only Transfer process in FMBB ?

 

Regards,

 

Prad Pat

↧
↧

Carry forward of Open Items - FMJ2

December 7, 2014, 3:37 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We are using BCS in EHP 7.0. i am trying to carry forward the open items with FMJ2 and Availability control is "Update without check". When i execute the transaction, system is carryforwarding to next year without any errors.

 

How ever, if i see the availability report FMAVCR01  for 2015-

 

Budget for 2015 is 0 - Consumable budget - 0, Consumed Budget is 20000$ and available amount is -20000$.

 

Where if i add the budget for 2015 of 50000$, then consumable budget - 50000, Consumed is 20000 and available amount is 30000$. it is consuming from current year.

 

Please help me on this.

 

Regards

Sam

↧

fmbs149: delete posting address

December 4, 2014, 4:13 am
$
0
0


Hello,

 

I have posting in the following year and I do not have activated the AVC for future years. So some users made postings (earmarked funds) without budget, as it was no needed.

 

Now, I have changed the fund center structure and the users have adapted these earmarked funds to the new structure. The value for the old posting address is 0, but the are entries remain in the FMIT table.

 

I would like to delete the posting addres from FMBSPO but I get of course error fmbs149.

 

Any idea to delete the entries? I do not want the user to use them any more.

 

Regards,

Daniel

↧
Search

Wrong Commitment reduction

December 7, 2014, 10:41 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

Scenario

 

Step 1 creation of PR for service 100 @ 9 = 900 (Commitment Updated with 900 under PR)

Step 2 creation of PO for service 100 @ 8 = 800 (Commitment Updated with 800 under PO and reduction has done only for 800)

 

My current budget usage is still 900 and it has not reduced to 800

 

Please help

 

Lincy

↧

Cost Center 1:1 Relationship with fund center

June 15, 2012, 9:56 am
$
0
0

Hi:

I have defined derivation based on material and valuation class and have derived fund center and commitment items based on it. I read on most of the occasion that there is 1 to1 relationship of fund center to cost center but here in this stock budgeting routed through MM, we do not need any cost center , stock GL account is balance sheet item and is a current asset, so in this case we will not need any cost center linked to fund center ..Right? I just want to confirm the assumption i have made.

Thanks

Regards

↧
↧

Deactivate Account Assignment Elements in Controlling

November 3, 2011, 10:17 pm
$
0
0

Dear Experts

 

I request your kind support on the below issue.

 

We have deactivated 'Account Assignment Elements in CO' ( i.e, Fund and Budget period). Due to this when we post depreciation Fund is not geting updated to Expese GL line item (depreciation GL A/c).

 

Is this issue occurs because of deactivation Account assignment elements in CO or some thing elese.

 

And also kindly suggest the major impacts If we deactivate 'Account Assignment Elements in CO'. I red some help information but not able to understand the function completely. In our business there is no process of planning and report CO line items.

Also I woulk like to know when we deactivate account assignment elements in CO.

 

Kindly suggest,

 

Thanks in advance

 

Rao

↧

Error : Annual budget exceeded (FMAVC005)

May 23, 2011, 9:22 pm
$
0
0

Dear guru,

 

I want to create PR (ME51N), the net total amount is 50.000. But the error message shows :

 

Annual budget exceeded by 11.812.000 IDR (FM PB Availability Control) for document item 00010

Message no. FMAVC005

 

Diagnosis

The annual budget is exceeded by 11.812.000 IDR (FM PB Availability Control) for the document item 00010. Budget control on outgoing amounts ( ceiling type Expenditures) raised this message for the following combination of availability control ledger, fiscal year (and if applicable, year of cash effectivity) and control object:

 

9H/2011/DUMMY/EXPENSE1

 

FYI,

Consumable Budget : 35.700.000

Consumed Amount : 650.000

Available Amount : 35.050.000

 

The error message says it's exceed 11.812.000, it seem Available Amount for budget is - 11.762.000 (50.000 - 11.812.000)

It's strange...

 

Please tell me how to solve this...

 

Thank you..

↧

Unable to clear customer through F-32

December 9, 2014, 4:42 am
$
0
0

We just went live today with our FM (BCS) Module. Everything is fine except when people is trying to clearing customers through F-32

 

We have the "No commitment itme in line 0001 xxxx xxxxxxxxxxx 2014" error when try to post the clearing document.

 

We have activated the trace in FMDERIVE but, the error shows up without even entering in the derivation strategies we set. It looks like some configuration is missing or maybe we have to run some transaction in order to add the commitment item to these documents?.

 

We have tried to execute transaction FMN0 for these documents but system says the document is correct.

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks and regards, Mauro B.

↧
Viewing all 1444 articles
Browse latest View live
Search