Hi All,
We are moving from header level costing to operational level costing in EAM but when I try to create PR from order I get error for FM
Message no. CO634
I got one note 1970198 but still error is same. It should pick Fund and Fund Center from FM assignment from order. I tried to create one derivation
Cost element then fund and fund center to be fixed but still getting same error. PLease help.
Thanks,
Vishal
Hi Experts,
I got new question that when user create credit request (t-code : va01) and enter fund code and fund center in account assignment tab as below;
condition type ZDTX define gl account type expense that will add budget in specific fund code and fund center before.
User would like system check available budget from specific fund code and fund center. If credit amount is exceed budget, system do not allow to save this order.
Please help.
Jittima
Hi,
We are Ecc6 ehp4 and implementing the BCS part of the FM. For tax setting I have selected "Gross Tax".
I have a budgte for 80000/- Now I have created a PR for 10Qty @8000, and created a PO for 5 Quantity @8000/-. and tax code includes Excise 12.36% which is beneficial and Vat 5% which is not beneficial. Now at the time of saving the purchase order, system is giving the error of budget exceeded and the amount is exactly equal to VAT amount. I am getting the same error in all cases where I have tax which is non beneficial.
Is the selection of " Gross Tax" is correct? or is there any other setting I need to look at?
Please advise
Regards
Shailesh Joshi
Hi Experts,
We are at Version EA -PS - 600 - SAP Enterprise Extension Public Services ,. We have activated EA-PS .Component .
While in IMG , try to activate , system throwing following error message :
Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM) - System ,Function is not possible; application IS-PS is not active
Message no. FI292
Diagnosis
Activating the Funds Management Government functions at client level requires the cross-client activation of the application.
System Response
The Funds Management functions are not activated.
Procedure
First activate the cross-client IS-PS application by using transaction FIBF under Settings -> Identification -> SAP Applications.
If we go and see above Path : IS -PS , check box is in NOT CHANGABLE .
Please sugges us to activate the same.
Regards,
Sujana
Hi,
We are Ecc6 ehp4 and implementing the BCS part of the FM. For tax setting I have selected "Gross Tax".
I have a budgte for 80000/- Now I have created a PR for 10Qty @8000, and created a PO for 5 Quantity @8000/-. and tax code includes Excise 12.36% which is beneficial and Vat 5% which is not beneficial. Now at the time of saving the purchase order, system is giving the error of budget exceeded and the amount is exactly equal to VAT amount. I am getting the same error in all cases where I have tax which is non beneficial.
Is the selection of " Gross Tax" is correct? or is there any other setting I need to look at?
Please advise
Regards
Shailesh Joshi
Hi all,
Our requirement is that Fund Center should be derived from the cost center field (location tab) in the PM order. I am using function module FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER to achieve the result. I am getting the result but it is disturbing my process orders creation as there is no cost center field in process order master
I want to make a condition based on PM order type. what is the best option. Can i use the following
First derivation rule . update Order Type to USERTEMP1
Second derivation rule: call FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER and put a condition to check USERTEMP1 is PM order types
Please advise. Will it affect any other area
Lincy
Dear experts,
I would like to ask you about the following incorrect scenario we are facing:
in my client, the PO creates commitment, then the GR recudes that PO commitment and whenever the invoice is created, it reduces the GR commitment.
This would be a normal picture at FMRP_RW_BUDCON for a complete delivered and invoiced PO:
PO 0100 1,000 EUR
PO 0200 -1,000 EUR (at the moment of GR creation)
GR 0100 1,000 EUR
GR 0200 -1,000 EUR (at the moment of the invoice creation) --> this is the missing line
Invoice 0100 1,000 EUR
However, we are having cases in which the line GR 0200 is missing and therefore it is resulting in double Budget consumption.
Do you know what this can be happening?
I am wondering if these missing 0200 lines were ever appearing in the report. Could it be that those lines got missassinged (to unproper combination of Fund Center and Commitment ítem) by the execution of the reconstructions transaccions (FMCD, FMCN, FMCT, FMN4N, FMN0, FMAVCREINIT)? Is there a way to find out if those missing 0200 lines are in the system under any other address?
In case the missing 0200 lines were never created, is there any way to make them appear so that we do not get doublé consumption?
Any help will be very much appreciated.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Mercedes.
Hi,
I need to convert error message in to warning message. I have changed the tolerance profile from error to warning. After this I was able to create the PR without budget but when I tried to post the invoice it is still giving me the error message, where else need to chagne ?
please advise
Regards
Shailesh
Hi,
We have enable Posting date as optional filed in creation of Purchase order due to positing relating to previous months. This field option enabled due to avoid the error "Posting date is earlier than the Existing date/Period" when you do GR.
Scanaraio -
1. PO consists of 01 line item. When PO is updated with One posting date in PO Header, its affecting the FM Posting date with updated Posting date and able to Post GR.
E.g. PO Doc date 22.02.2015, Posting date is 08.02.2015,Creation Date 08.04.2015.
We Observed that in FM Ledgers through FMAVCR01 Report, Before Posting date updation, FM Posting date was updated with PO Creation date. Where as after updating Posting date in above PO, FM Posting updated with Posting date. Then system allowing to post the GR Document on 22.02.2015, subsequent to PO document.
2. The related PO consists of 04 Line items. Where as PO is updated with One Posting date in PO Header is affecting the FM Ledgers only for First Line item.
Eg. PO doc date is 28.01.2015 and Posting date is 28.01.2015, Creation date 08.04.2015.
We observed that in FM Ledger through FMAVCR01 report. The posting date updated for above PO is updated only for first line item of the PO. The rest of 02nd, 03rd and 04th line items of FM Posting date is still showing PO Creation date. When we trying to post the GR Document on 22.02.2015, system generating the error Posting date is earlier than existing date/period.
Issue : System not updating the FM Posting date with PO Header posting date, for all line items in Scanario-2.
Please hlep on this.
Thanks & Regards
Sam
Hi Experts,
I need an understanding regarding Budget Derivation Strategy which should be integrated with PS.
Under PS, we can assign budget at WBS Level straight away without giving any cost combinations like we do in FM.
We will cover all our budgeting needs from FM instead of PS.
Now my question is, what would be the best derivation strategy for applying the required level of budgeting at WBS Level?
What should be the prerequisites and how to create derivation strategy for the same? Any Example strategy will be highly appreciated.
Please guide!
Regards,
Zain Bashir
Hi,
I have read all the discussions on this releated issue and almost did all the suggested config's. But still, if i try to carry forward a PO from old fical year to new the, consumbale budget of the nw FY goes negative. The configs that are done are as below.
Regards
Tushar
Hi All,
We are moving from header level costing to operational level costing in EAM but when I try to create PR from order I get error for FM
Message no. CO634
I got one note 1970198 but still error is same. It should pick Fund and Fund Center from FM assignment from order. I tried to create one derivation
Cost element then fund and fund center to be fixed but still getting same error. PLease help.
Thanks,
Vishal
I am trying to find a way to get the clearing document for an invoice. I can get the PR, PO, GR, and IR for a given purchase, I am just having an issue linking any data from the previous to the clearing document. Ultimately I am interested in finding out when the Invoice was paid via the tables. Can anyone shed some light or point me in the right direction? I have tried querying BSEG, but this times out. I have also tried to find linking information in BSAK, but I have been unable. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Hello everyone.
Does anyone know if a document generated via FBA6 transaction (F-47) can generate entries in the ledger 9I (Commitment Budget)?
There is no PO or an asset or a CO order related to the document.
We started with the FM-BCS this month and only the ledger 9H is being updated with the values of the FBA6 documents.
Thank you very much for any help.
Hi,
We have implmented the BCS part of FM. In that for revenue items the tolerance profile attached is for information only. So when any invoice is being made there is only information message and system does not stop for non availability of budget.
The issue is when I reverse the revenue system is stopping for the want of budget, how to resolve this? Shall tick on "inactive" indicator in front of Revenue items in tolerance profie?
Pleaes guide
Shailesh
Dear Fellows,
I am hadling a problem in the Invoice Entry for Internal Orders. Error message FMUP127 appears and I am trying to follow SAP note 1576645 instructions.
It says that I got to change derivation of FM account assignment at FMDERIVE so that, as early as the RWIN-event CHECK, the correct account assignment can be derived and it is subsequently no longer necessary to overwrite them.
Honestly I donu2019t understand this instruction. Exactly how can I do this? What and where are the changes suggested at FMDERIVE? Does anybody can help me up with this?
Rgds,
Gustavo.
Dear Experts,
It is a requirement from my customer, the tax item be populated with the same earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund of the related expense or revenue item.
The transaction OBBH and the exit presented in attachment was used to try to achieve that requirement.
The accounting document was correctly created with the tax item correctly populated with the earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund from the related expense item.
The funds management document was also correctly created including the tax item with the correct commitment item, fund, funds center and functional area.
The problem detected is related with the missing tax value in consumption history of the earmarked fund. The value of the tax item is not appearing in records of tables KBLP and FMIOI.
Could you please help me with this problem?
Kind Regards,
Rui Neves
Is it possible to carryforward a parked FI document to a new fiscal year? I have looked at a lot of documentation and it appears as if the parked document should really be deleted. But, what we have told users is to change the posting date to the new year when the previous fiscal year is closed. This works well for those documents that may have recently been created but did not complete workflow before fiscal year end.
I looked at transaction FMJ2. But, for value type, there is not a choice for "60" (parked documents). I went through the IMG to figure out if I need to set something there but could not find anything.
Hello everybody! We are having an issue at the company where i work. When the capital expense accruals were reversed in the current year they were automatically posted to auc and it was not supposed to because now reversals are posted twice, manually and automatically, This has not happened in the prior years and it's difficult to tell what was done differently this year that triggered the system to post expenses automatically to auc. Any idea on what might have caused the system to automatically post accrual reversals to auc or what was done in the prior years to prevent the system from automatically posting the accrual reversal to auc ? Thank you in advance@
Hi PSCD Folks,
We are trying to generate and print 'Account Statements' using standard correspondence events (702 and 703) but after entering parameters in transaction FPCOPARA when I try to save; I receive message "Entries 000000 found Do you still want to save". If I save and execute the run program doesn't throws any error but I don't get any data in spool...Which means no correspondence was picked for printing?
Conifiguration:
Data is present in Table DFKKCOH and entries have correspondence keys asscoaited.
Can anyone PLEASE guide me what is wrong or if there is an OSS note (I didn't find any)???
I am functional so ABAPers please advise in layman terms !!
Appreciation + Points for HELP
Thanks a lot,
Sid