Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - SAP for Public Sector
Viewing all 1444 articles
Browse latest View live

Value BLANK / SPACE is invalid for account assignment element "fund" + KGI2

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

Kindly suggest reason for the below error which is comming during KGI2 actual over calculation

 

I tried to activate Trace to see the reason but nothing is displayed in trace

 

 

Value BLANK / SPACE is invalid for account assignment element "fund"

Message no. F6804

Diagnosis

You have not made an entry for FM account assignment element Fund and you left the value BLANK or SPACE. This is not permitted.

System Response

The system will carry out no further processing.

Procedure

Enter a valid value for FM account assignment element Fund.



As per below link configuration is already changed


Fund is optional for posting with FM area XXX until 9999


 

Regards

Upendar

 

 


MM-FM integration. How to stop update of Fund Center and Commitment Item

$
0
0

Hello!

Anyone please help. MM-FM integration.

 

Our problem is after automatic creation of PR and PO from work orders, and the fund center and commitment item in the PR and PO has been changed/updated by the user, and then we change something in the work order and save it, the fund center and commitment item of the PR and PO goes back to default value (based on FMderive). Is there a way to stop this?

 

 

Thanks in advance for your help.

 

Regards,

Rona

FMF0 not updated value type 57

$
0
0

Hello.

 

 

 

When I run FMF0 transaction is not updating the value type 57 for invoices generated by MIRO transaction. Only invoices generated by FB60 transaction are being updated.

 

 

 

Does anyone know what could be the problem ??

 

 

 

Thank you very much.

 

 

 

José Augusto.

Transport FMDERIVE rules using transaction SCC1 on same server

$
0
0

Hi,

I am unable to Transport FMDERIVE rules using transaction SCC1 on same server fron client to other client. After running this transaction I get error message and tranport is not tkaen place.

Saeed

PSCD Correspondence FPCOPARA - Entries 0000000 found

$
0
0

Hi PSCD Folks,

 

We are trying to generate and print 'Account Statements' using standard correspondence events (702 and 703) but after entering parameters in transaction FPCOPARA when I try to save; I receive message "Entries 000000 found Do you still want to save". If I save and execute the run program doesn't throws any error but I don't get any data in spool...Which means no correspondence was picked for printing?

 

Conifiguration:

  1. Correspondecne Type and Variants are in place
  2. Business Partner and Contract Accounts have Correspondecn type assigned.
  3. Form are assigned (in FICA correspondence and in Cross- Application Componenets)

 

Data is present in Table DFKKCOH and entries have correspondence keys asscoaited.

 

Can anyone PLEASE guide me what is wrong or if there is an OSS note (I didn't find any)???

 

I am functional so ABAPers please advise in layman terms !!

 

 

Appreciation + Points for HELP

 

Thanks a lot,

 

Sid

Value BLANK / SPACE is invalid for account assignment element "fund" + KGI2

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

Kindly suggest reason for the below error which is comming during KGI2 actual over calculation

 

I tried to activate Trace to see the reason but nothing is displayed in trace

 

 

Value BLANK / SPACE is invalid for account assignment element "fund"

Message no. F6804

Diagnosis

You have not made an entry for FM account assignment element Fund and you left the value BLANK or SPACE. This is not permitted.

System Response

The system will carry out no further processing.

Procedure

Enter a valid value for FM account assignment element Fund.



As per below link configuration is already changed


Fund is optional for posting with FM area XXX until 9999


 

Regards

Upendar

 

 

FI Clearing Document

$
0
0

I am trying to find a way to get the clearing document for an invoice.  I can get the PR, PO, GR, and IR for a given purchase, I am just having an issue linking any data from the previous to the clearing document.  Ultimately I am interested in finding out when the Invoice was paid via the tables.  Can anyone shed some light or point me in the right direction?  I have tried querying BSEG, but this times out.  I have also tried to find linking information in BSAK, but I have been unable.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

Lines of Amount type 0200 (reduction) not appearing in FMRP_RW_BUDCON

$
0
0

Dear experts,

 

I would like to ask you about the following incorrect scenario we are facing:

 

in my client, the PO creates commitment, then the GR recudes that PO commitment and whenever the invoice is created, it reduces the GR commitment.

 

This would be a normal picture at FMRP_RW_BUDCON for a complete delivered and invoiced PO:

 

PO       0100     1,000 EUR

PO       0200    -1,000 EUR (at the moment of GR creation)

GR       0100     1,000 EUR

GR       0200    -1,000 EUR (at the moment of the invoice creation) --> this is the missing line

Invoice 0100     1,000 EUR

 

 

However, we are having cases in which the line GR 0200 is missing and therefore it is resulting in double Budget consumption.

 

Do you know what this can be happening?

 

 

I am wondering if these missing 0200 lines were ever appearing in the report. Could it be that those lines got missassinged (to unproper combination of Fund Center and Commitment ítem) by the execution of the reconstructions transaccions (FMCD, FMCN, FMCT, FMN4N, FMN0, FMAVCREINIT)? Is there a way to find out if those missing 0200 lines are in the system under any other address?

 

 

In case the missing 0200 lines were never created, is there any way to make them appear so that we do not get doublé consumption?

 

 

Any help will be very much appreciated.

 

Thank you very much.

Best regards,

Mercedes.


Fund Center derivation based on PM order

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

Our requirement is that Fund Center should be derived from the cost center field (location tab) in the PM order. I am using function module FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER to achieve the result. I am getting the result but it is disturbing my process orders creation as there is no cost center field in process order master

 

I want to make a condition based on PM order type. what is the best option. Can i use the following

 

First derivation rule . update Order Type to USERTEMP1

 

Second derivation rule: call FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER and put a condition to check USERTEMP1 is PM order types


Please advise. Will it affect any other area


Lincy

Activate / Deactivate Funds Management

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am getting issue in posting my MIRO entries for 2014, and I have activated the BCS part from 1st Apr 2015. System is giving the error of "FI 311 No Commitment Items entered in item xxxxxx"

 

I have posted few transactions in Mar 2015 through FB60 which were posted perfectly, few service entries were also posted which were entered after FM activation. In the year 2015 revenue invoices were also posted perfectly.

 

But there are these MIRO invoices where service entries were entered and released before activation of funds management. Now this has halted our ending process serverly. Consultants are working on the issue, but time is running out.

 

Meanwhile, can the below be the solution

I want to know, with this scenario can I deactivate Funds management and also deactivate "update" will  this step enable me to post the pending MIRO documents where I am getting issue (Error FI311). I will stop posting for Apr 2015. Once these documents get posted I will again activate the Funds management and activate the "Update"

 

Please guide

 

Regards

 

Shailesh

FM account assignment-Error-Message no. FMBS123 - Return code 4.

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have been getting the below error when I am trying to post asset acquisition in tcode F-90. Other than asset transactions, this error does not occur.

 

000462.png

 

I have tried changing budget and posting addresses settings but still i was not able to find the solution to this problem.

Please help me to resolve this issue.

 

Regards,

 

Atif Amin

FMCF103

$
0
0

Hi,

 

While posting the SES in Apr 15 against the order which was created before activation of FM, user is getting error FMCF103. What does this error signifies. I am geting Fund Center and Commitment item correct but while posting the entry I am getting this error.

 

What I need to do?

 

Please advise

 

Shailesh

FM - SD check available budget

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Our system cannot check available budget from credit memo (SD).

Our Process is create credit request (t-code : va01) and enter fund code and fund center in account assignment tab as below;

condition type ZDTX define gl account type expense that will add budget in specific fund code and fund center before.

User would like system check available budget from specific fund code and fund center. If credit amount is exceed budget, system do not allow to save this order.

 

Please help.

 

Jittima

Error in PR

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have created a PR which is before activation of FM. The Purhcase order was created after FM activation. The purhcase order is not yet released, while making the correction in purhcase order, system is giving the error

 

"Posting in fis. yr 2014 is not possible, in FM open doc. XXXXXXX in fis. yr 2015 "

 

Document number is a PR no. As advised in the error message I ran the report  RFFMCCFR, but in that report also I am getting message " No items found"

 

I am getting this error only for this Purhcase Requesition.

 

Please guide.

 

Regards

 

Shailesh

AVC on Fund in Annual Budgeting

$
0
0

Hi,

We are using annual budgeting but our real need is to have periodic budgeting so that we can have monthly or at least quarterly budgeting. but due to the month end activity in periodic budgeting we skipped the concept of periodic budgeting instead we went for another workaround by creating Month Wise Funds for our FM Area. Now we have OPEX-JAN, OPEX-FEB etc. We have used posting date in our derivation rule so that based on posting date we system can derive appropriate Fund. Now as per my limited understanding of Funds management in annual budgeting system checks for the total budget and generates messages accordingly. in my scenario that would be as bellow:

 

Opex-Jan          10,000

Opex-Feb          20,000

Opex-Mar          30,000

Total                 60,000

 

 

Now In above example we have used different funds to handle our monthly budgeting requirement but when it comes to AVC system will note check for budget of Opex-Jan, Opex-Feb or Opex-Mar Separately instead it will check the total amount of budget which is 60,000. when ever posting is done in FI, FM will respond in accordance with budget position of 60,000. my question is if there is a way to have budget checks activated for funds. like when ever Opex-Jan budget is to be consumed system should consider 10,000 to be total budget and the act accordingly. Is this possible or do we have to go for Periodic budgeting for this requirement.

 

 

Regards,


Material Procurement using FM-BCS & GM-GTE objects in Warehouse Concept 3

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

We are implementing FM-BCS and GM-GTE in a University. Our client has chosen Warehouse Concept 3 for their MM related Scenarios, where in case of FM-BCS, budget of Warehouse will be consumed initially and then the same will restored, when consumption is issued to Cost Centre/Order/Project consuming respective cost object budget.

 

Posting Example Warehouse Concept 3 - Funds Management (FI-FM) - SAP Library

 

So far, in case of FM-BCS, we are deriving Funds Center+Commitment Item on the basis of Valuation Class during PR/PO, which is working fine. But how can we derive Grant in case when purchases are being sponsored from a Grant. What unique source field can do the job here?


Thanks in advance.


Regards,



Amar Lal

Tax amount is not appearing in consumption history of earmarked fund

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

It is a requirement from my customer, the tax item be populated with the same earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund of the related expense or revenue item.

 

The transaction OBBH and the exit presented in attachment was used to try to achieve that requirement.

 

The accounting document was correctly created with the tax item correctly populated with the earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund from the related expense item.

 

The funds management document was also  correctly created including the tax item with the correct commitment item, fund, funds center and functional area.

 

The problem detected is related with the missing tax value in consumption history of the earmarked fund. The value of the tax item is not appearing in records of tables KBLP and FMIOI.

 

Could you please help me with this problem?

 

Kind Regards,

Rui Neves

Activate / Deactivate Funds Management

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am getting issue in posting my MIRO entries for 2014, and I have activated the BCS part from 1st Apr 2015. System is giving the error of "FI 311 No Commitment Items entered in item xxxxxx"

 

I have posted few transactions in Mar 2015 through FB60 which were posted perfectly, few service entries were also posted which were entered after FM activation. In the year 2015 revenue invoices were also posted perfectly.

 

But there are these MIRO invoices where service entries were entered and released before activation of funds management. Now this has halted our ending process serverly. Consultants are working on the issue, but time is running out.

 

Meanwhile, can the below be the solution

I want to know, with this scenario can I deactivate Funds management and also deactivate "update" will  this step enable me to post the pending MIRO documents where I am getting issue (Error FI311). I will stop posting for Apr 2015. Once these documents get posted I will again activate the Funds management and activate the "Update"

 

Please guide

 

Regards

 

Shailesh

Fund Center derivation based on PM order

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

Our requirement is that Fund Center should be derived from the cost center field (location tab) in the PM order. I am using function module FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER to achieve the result. I am getting the result but it is disturbing my process orders creation as there is no cost center field in process order master

 

I want to make a condition based on PM order type. what is the best option. Can i use the following

 

First derivation rule . update Order Type to USERTEMP1

 

Second derivation rule: call FMDT_READ_MD_ORDER and put a condition to check USERTEMP1 is PM order types


Please advise. Will it affect any other area


Lincy

FMRP_RW_BUDCON

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

When i am executing the Budcon report with mentioned parameters.

 

Fund 30

Fund Center 4050300000

GL 260100300

Functional Area 88203000000

 

The report gives the values.

 

Funds Center/Commitment Item

Consumable Budget

Consumed Budget

Available Amount

Current Budget

Commitment/Actuals

FdsCtr/CmmtItem

86917000

83198965

3718035

86917000

79115949

4050300000  E WARD -EDUCATION

86917000

83198965

3718035

86917000

79115949

260100300  Grants to pvt. Primary aided Schools

86917000

83198965

3718035

86917000

79115949

 






       


Consumed budget - Rs. 83,198,965.00


But when i see the consumed budget Actual line item documents by sorting period wise i have only Rs.32,936,574.00.



Period

Commt bdgt

Payment budget

 

 

 

Period 1

0

0

2

0

3,09,861.00

3

0

0

4

0

-728

5

0

0

6

0

0

7

0

0

8

0

1,10,169.00

10

0

3,35,765.00

11

0

243,35,988.00

12

0

78,45,519.00

 

 

 

 

0

329,36,574.00

 

Please suggest me...on this..

 

 

Thanks in Advance

Viewing all 1444 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>